M

JURY DELIBERATIONS FOR WICKED PROBLEMS

    • A Constitution for The Sanctuary
    • About Us
    • Hurdle: A workable Constitution cannot be imagined
    • Hurdle: The Sanctuary cannot be sustainable over time
    • Hurdle: The Sanctuary cannot keep its citizens safe
    • Hurdle: There is nowhere for The Sanctuary to be located
    • Reasons for Is The Sanctuary feasible
    • The Refugee Problem
    • The Unconventional Solution
      • Sanctuary Deliberation

Hurdle: The inclusion of direct representation by an AI agent will not reduce irrational prejudices citizens may hold

astranieri

Aug 25—2025
Sanctuary, Sanctuary:Hurdle:Constitution

The Jury heard evidence that citizen’s may hold biases that do not contribute to reaching optimal decisions

BUT

An AI agent is not intended to vet or modify its citizen’s beliefs but simple reflect them. However, an AI agent can help to confidentially make biases the citizen has explicit

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading…

Leave a comment Cancel reply

←Previous
Next→

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Mastodon
  • Tumblr
  • Bluesky
  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • JURY DELIBERATIONS FOR WICKED PROBLEMS
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • JURY DELIBERATIONS FOR WICKED PROBLEMS
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d